Images from the Id – What you see is not what you get. Part 1 the Pinhole Camera

Who ever was the first person to utter the phrase “What you see is what you get” started one of the biggest lies to ever perpetuate itself through civilization. May be in the long run it does serve a purpose in taking the responsibility for careful mental decisions from the producer to the consumer but in the real world do you get what you see? We could debate issues as truth in lending and advertising but that will always be something everyone will talk about but no one will do anything about.

On the other hand in a photograph there is no debate about whether you get what you see or not. What you see is much more complicated than simply what is there in front of you. Seeing is complicated by the addition of perception or what your brain sees. The phrase “It’s in the eye of the beholder” could not be more true. Ten photographers take photographs of the same thing and will usually get 10 differently perceived images. We have different brains so we perceive differently. I have always wondered. Is the color I see as red is the same as that which you see or is it your purple?

The human eye is a wonder. It can see very large variations in contrast (the differences in brightness of areas of an image). It can, subconsciously, continually focus for a perception of infinite depth of field (until we get older and lose true close focusing). If you will remember the Depth of Field is the portion of a scene which is in focus nearer and farther from the lens. Two eye working together give us three-dimensional vision and depth perception. Although there are some newly invented cameras which attempt to match the eye in these respects, generally the camera fails to get close to the eye’s ability.

When I took my first formal photography course in college, the first project was to construct a pinhole camera (Yes this was a long time ago). This had several lessons: First – A pinhole is a lens with resolution limited only by the sizes of the pinhole, smaller is better and the diffraction of the light through the pinhole, bigger is better. As most things in life it’s a balance and you try to get the smallest hole possible. Second – The pinhole has infinite depth of field. Third – the focal length could be easily changed for telephoto or wide angle, introducing the Physics concept of the Inverse Square Law for light intensity. The usual exposure was about 10 sec. or more but the results were interesting and surprising.

Next step let’s see if we can do it with digital

This week’s Photo

“Cannon” Castillo de Marcos St. Augustine  Florida, ISO 100; 1/45 shutter speed; f 19; 0 EV; 70/105 mm, Aperture priority; spot metered. Cropped for composition; processed and sharpened in Lightroom 5.3. A small aperture was used to get the increase in depth of field

Images from the Id – Timing or In Search of the Eagle Part 1

This is a tale of frustration and success. It repeats itself over and over. Scenario – Every winter the Bald Eagle can be found in locations where it normally isn’t found during the breeding season. Locally, there is a reservoir where photographers have the chance of photographing the eagles at comparatively closer distances. This year I have seen 5-6 adults and 1 or 2 immature individuals.  Sunday morning, we arrived at the park at about 9 am usually eagles don’t have specific feeding or activity time like some birds. We wanted the good morning light but enough to use lower ISO settings.

Lesson – Something you need to understand is that the light for that special photographs is by far the best early in the morning or late in the day, stretching up to about 1-2 hour after sunrise or about 1-2 hour before sunset. This time varies with season. It lasts longer in the winter because of the low sun in northern locations. If you want “The Light” shoot early or late. Midday stinks.

Lesson – Don’t expect a great number of useable images. Too many branches in the way, birds just not doing anything. In the days of film portraits these were fine but now you get to a point where you already have 500 sitting eagles. You need activity and/or interaction. They have to be doing something even if it is just flying. We shot about 150 frames and probably only four I like. This where timing kicks in. If you are not in the right place at the right time and prepared you will miss it. The lucky shot is usually the results of hours of waiting, looking, experience and being in the right spot. There is no such thing as lucky shot just hard work.

Lesson – Camera setting. Use a camera which you can set on continuous servo. This allows the camera to continually focus and not “lock on”. For area use a fairly small spot focus or if you can 3D tracking. You need to experiment. Focusing is tough. Set the shutter rate to the fastest you have. You will through away a lot but you will see the second or third in a sequence will be the sharpest. It has to do with the mechanics of pressing the button. Keep shutter speed up yet be aware of problems of higher ISO. Learn your camera. Accurate focus and fast shutter speed make sharp photos.

Lesson – get close. A longer lens, 400 mm on DX DSLR is good. Walk closer, you probably scare them away but in some areas they have little fear of man and it is possible. Know your location. Don’t crop the image too much know your camera and software.

Next week: The Frustration

This week’s Photo

“Immature Bald Eagle” 9 am early, low light show the underside of the bird,  ISO 400; 1/2000 shutter speed; f 5.6; 1/2 EV over exposed for shadows; 400/600 mm, Aperture priority; spot metered. Cropped for composition; processed in Lightroom 5.3

Images from the Id – Ok so I bought it

I’ve been watching to much TV lately. I know it’s my choice and I am actualyl spending less time in front of the flat screen. We used to call it “The Tube”. Come to think about that might have been confusing to a resident of London. All of this mostly brainless excuse for communicating had one thing in common, Advertising. I have gotten a little tired the three point approach of selling me something I don’t want, something I don’t need and something I can’t afford. I think I have just opened Pandora’s Box (not the music streaming but related). Of all of the ideals, its seems we have become greed driven. It is the basis of our economy and an increasing number of individual approach to life with that motivation. Humans are herd carnivores, we do what everyone else does one way or another. We devour everything in our path from hamburgers to natural resources. It has nothing to do with what is right or wrong just consume, consume, consume. Advertising has help destroy our health and personal budgets. Credit has become ridiculous to supply the feeding frenzy. I can be just as bad. Nikon has a new camera only $6k, gee I could carpet the house for that but well…it’s a new camera…gee I have plenty on Visa. Drool. Drool. Pant. Pant. That D4s is sooo cool. That D4s does soooo much. I could… To keep it short I didn’t buy the camera because it flunk two of the three tenets of advertising, something I don’t need and something I can’t afford. There is something you should buy; Adobe Creative Cloud for Photographer at $9.99 per month IT IS A EXCEPTIONAL DEAL. but the special price ends soon. Buy on brethren. Does that sound like George Carlin

“The Wall” The titlephoto is a study of textures and patterns. It was taken at The Castillo de Marcos in Saint Augustine Florida.1/45 sec, EV no override, ISO 100,f 9.5, 29/43 mm, The Nikon D5100 was used to get a lower perspective. In this image processing and cropping in Lightroom 5.3 were quite significant because elf the strange perspective and angles of the bricks. Lightroom 5.3 has an automatic perspective correction and in THIS case it worked well. It is fun to work with because sometimes you get strange results. As with all RAW imaging sharpening and color are very important.

“The Wall – Monochrome” this is the same image file but converted to black and white using Nik’s Silver Effects Pro 2, the most used for B&W conversation. A yellow filter was applied to bring out the warmer colors and darken the cooler. It is very important to use a good color file to get a good B&W.

Images from the Id – Of Monkeys , Apes and Men

There are many types of monkeys. Some are important some are not. Some are big others are small. Some are psychological some are zoological (please pronounce that correctly with a “long o“ and not like in “you”,  although both are becoming but being a “Zoo – long-o-logy” major I was chewed out once for that. The place “Zoo” is different.) The physiological ones have again taken their toll. It is always sad when the monkey of drug abuse takes another person who is significant to our world. The creative artist is always under the pressure of his/her calling. Because their talent requires so much of them and their soul it seems they have a greater tendency to have the addiction, or is it just because they are more visible to the public and our attention is  centered on them. It is with great sadness when we lose another  of these artists who’s work we have much enjoyed and honored.

In biology there is something called Evolution. Some people think it should be debated and compared to the “Biblical” origins of species (different forms of life). The debate is totally unintelligent  and valueless. First, which creation story of the Bible do you argue? There are at least two and they are different. Second, like any well proven and demonstrated theory of science, Evolution has always changed to take in account any new discoveries that have been made. Enough said for their source. It is of interest that the theory of Darwin is not the same as the modern concept. In fact, giving Darwin the credit is totally wrong. Even in Darwin’s time, Alfred Russell  Wallace working half way around the world simultaneously and independently came up with a theory almost identical to Darwin’s. Even they weren’t the first. The Creationists disregard the work of Thomas Malthus’ on population sizes, reproductive rates and predation and Charles Lylle’s works on Geology time.  Comparing the creation myths of various cultures you find no such agreement or common sources.

A while back Bill Nye, the Science Guy, met  Ken Ham the founder of the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky to debate, in front of  a sold-out audience, concerning whether or not the Earth is 6,000 or so years old. You’re kidding me! It would be more significant to debate whether toads cause warts. With toads there  “might be” at least some substantiation for both sides. A debate of Evolution only tends to legitimatize  a totally unsupportable position. It has always seemed strange to me how people can firmly believe that a television actually produces a picture and sound when the theories and science behind that has less proof than evolution.

Old Man of the Forrest –

This image was taken at the Albuquerque New Mexico Zoo the original Metadata 1/2000 sec, ISO 1600, f 5.6, Aperture priority 400/600mm. I probably should have decreased the shutter speed to 1/500 and the ISO to 400 but I was concerned with handholding that lens and it wasn’t a bright day.

Old Man of the Forrest Print

The Print was processed in Adobe Lightroom 5.3 using Topaz plugins, Topaz PhotofxLab allows layering and doing a Pastel layer using Simplify Plugin and giving it a 36% opacity and a normal bend mode. The eyes were masked from the pastel layer to bring back their sharpness and exposure. The from Lightroom a 11X14 print was made. It won a second place in its first competition.